Santa, as we tell children, is a bearded stranger who keeps a secret file on their behaviour, breaks into houses at night, consumes unattended food, and leaves again before anyone wakes up.
In any other context, this is a safeguarding briefing.
The moment you try to run Santa through a modern HR filter, the whole thing goes from “wholesome festive myth” to “ongoing disciplinary case”. It turns out that once you apply risk matrices, policies, and GDPR to the North Pole, Christmas doesn’t just lose its sparkle. It fails the audit.
Santa’s Job Description: A Role Profile From Hell
Imagine trying to write Santa’s job description for the internal vacancies portal.
“Global Gift Distribution Operative (Senior). Fixed-term, one-night contract. Must be willing to travel.”
Responsibilities include:
- Entering private dwellings without prior appointment.
- Managing a large, entirely unexplained gift-production workforce.
- Maintaining a global database of children’s behaviour.
- Handling livestock in adverse weather conditions.
- Operating at height on poorly maintained roofs.
There is no clear line manager. Does Santa report to a Board? To a deity? To Coca‑Cola’s marketing department? The organisational chart is just a snowflake with question marks.
The working pattern is officially “annual, compressed into a single twenty‑four‑hour period”. HR looks at that, whispers “Working Time Regulations”, and faints into the mince pies.
Safeguarding: The Man in Red Meets the Modern World
Try this sentence out loud in front of a safeguarding lead:
“Once a year, a man you’ve never met slides down your chimney at night and walks around your house while you’re asleep.”
There is not a DBS check in existence that can make that sound better.
In a modern, HR‑compliant world, Santa would:
- Never enter a child’s bedroom.
- Never be left unaccompanied on school premises.
- Never, under any circumstances, invite children to sit on his lap while their parents queue for a photo and a plastic toy.
Grotto Santas would be separated from children by a tasteful Perspex barrier, everyone would sign a consent form, and somewhere in the background an exhausted Designated Safeguarding Lead would be making notes.
The phrase “He sees you when you’re sleeping” would be permanently retired pending legal advice.
The Naughty List vs GDPR
Santa keeps a list. He checks it twice. He uses it to categorise billions of data subjects as “naughty” or “nice”.
In other words: he operates a global, unregulated, behaviour‑based database on minors with no visible privacy policy.
Under GDPR, this is a crime scene.
What’s the lawful basis for processing? “Legitimate interest of Christmas” is not, tragically, an ICO‑approved category. Where is the data stored? Who has access? Can Mrs Claus download it as a spreadsheet?
Children have the right to access their data. Somewhere, under GDPR, a seven‑year‑old is entitled to submit a Subject Access Request:
“Dear Santa Data Protection Officer, please provide all information you hold on my behaviour from 1 January to 24 December, and evidence supporting the classification ‘naughty’.”
They also have the right to rectification:
“While I accept the events of June, I would like to draw your attention to my improved behaviour from September onwards and request an upgrade to ‘nice with mitigating circumstances’.”
And then there is data retention. How long, exactly, does Santa keep this stuff? Is there an annual delete cycle, or is there an eternal archive of every tantrum since 1974 sitting on a snow‑covered server farm?
Somewhere in the North Pole there ought to be a Data Protection Impact Assessment labelled “Magical Surveillance of Children – High Risk”. There is not.
Health and Safety: High‑Risk Sleigh Operations
Now picture the Christmas Eve risk assessment.
One elderly man, a sleigh of unclear manufacture, and eight reindeer with no formal training certificates. Working at height, in the dark, in winter, on sloping surfaces, while under significant time pressure.
The hazard list writes itself:
- Falls from roofs.
- Slips on ice.
- Manual handling of oversized sacks.
- Collisions with aircraft, drones, and over‑decorated garden centres.
The control measures would be biblical. Santa would be in a high‑vis red suit with reflective tape, wearing a safety harness attached to the sleigh. Chimneys would be declared “confined spaces” and added to the prohibited entry list. An accompanying elf would be designated as Spotter and Manual Handling Buddy.
Then there’s fatigue. Working a single, uninterrupted, global night shift breaches every regulation going. HR would insist on rota patterns, regional Santas, mandatory rest breaks, and possibly a unionised reindeer rep.
By the time the risk assessment is complete, it is 27 December and nothing has left the warehouse.
The Elf Question: Employment Status Unknown
Spare a thought for the elves.
Are they employees, contractors, or some sort of seasonal gig workforce paid in cocoa and whimsy? Do they receive sick pay? Maternity leave? Is there a pension scheme, or is the long‑term plan simply “live forever, we’re fictional”?
The working conditions raise several eyebrows. Endless peak season. No visible ventilation. A workload described in the literature as “all the toys in the world”. If you submitted the North Pole Workshop to a modern audit, it would come back labelled “high risk” and “very Etsy, but in a bad way”.
Give it five minutes and there’d be an Elf Union – Unite the Workshop – demanding seating, heating, protective clothing, and an end to unpaid overtime on Christmas Eve.
Santa, meanwhile, would be in a formal meeting being asked to explain the phrase “little helpers” to a tribunal.
Diversity, Inclusion, and the Face of Christmas
Then there’s the representational problem.
Modern organisations have diversity policies, inclusive imagery, and carefully curated stock photography. The North Pole has… one old white bloke in a red suit fronting the entire brand.
HR would at minimum suggest:
- A diverse, rotating cast of Santas.
- Inclusive grotto signage: “We welcome all festive traditions – participation not mandatory.”
- Training on unconscious bias in gift allocation.
Dwight, being Dwight, would also worry about whether elves count as a protected group, a marginalised workforce, or a separate species requiring their own HR framework. No‑one would enjoy that meeting.
Cookies, Milk, and the Bribery Policy
On the face of it, leaving out milk and cookies for Santa is a charming tradition. Through the lens of corporate policy, it looks suspiciously like hospitality.
Is Santa accepting gifts in exchange for favourable list placement? What is the declared value of a mince pie? Are we required to log every carrot offered to every reindeer in a centralised register of benefits in kind?
There are also health and safety concerns. Lactose intolerance. Allergens. Choking on a slightly overcooked homemade biscuit while halfway through Wiltshire.
In an HR‑compliant set‑up, Santa would have a standardised break schedule with pre‑approved snacks from a vetted supplier. The festive ritual of kids leaving whatever they like by the fireplace would be replaced by a laminated notice:
“For health and safety reasons, Santa is unable to accept food left on hearths. Please direct all hospitality enquiries to the North Pole Catering Framework.”
If that doesn’t kill the magic, nothing will.
Sleigh Emissions and the Sustainability Report
No modern operation escapes Environmental, Social and Governance reporting, and Santa is no exception.
Questions would be asked about the sleigh’s carbon footprint, the reindeer’s methane output, and whether magical propulsion counts as renewable energy or an unregulated loophole.
There would be strong pressure to electrify the sleigh by 2030, introduce reusable wrapping, and implement a strict “no pointless plastic tat” policy.
Children would wake up to thoughtfully sourced, ethically produced educational items and a leaflet on the circular economy. Santa would be forced to complete a four‑hour e‑learning module titled “Your Role in Our Green Future” before being allowed to touch the reins.
Performance Management for a Mythical Being
Even Santa would not escape the appraisal cycle.
His KPIs would include:
- On‑time gift delivery rate.
- Number of complaints received (broken toys, terrifying grotto encounters, misunderstood wish lists).
- Joy metrics, measured using a complex, definitely meaningless dashboard.
Once a year, he would sit down with Mrs Claus for a performance review.
“Strengths: high brand recognition, impressive logistical reach, consistent colour palette. Development areas: delegation, boundary‑setting, reducing reliance on informal data collection.”
Miss two Christmases in a row and he’d find himself on a Performance Improvement Plan with objectives like “reduce chimney‑related incidents by 20%” and “increase stakeholder confidence in sleigh‑based operations”.
Nothing says festive magic like a SMART goal.
Conclusion: If HR Ran Christmas
If you actually ran the Santa operation through a fully compliant HR, safeguarding, data protection, health and safety, sustainability and diversity framework, he’d never make it out of the door.
The elves would be on strike. The sleigh would be off the road pending an emissions review. The naughty list would be under investigation by the ICO. Santa himself would be suspended while a multidisciplinary panel considered whether “he knows when you’ve been bad or good” constitutes disproportionate monitoring.
Christmas Eve would be cancelled pending further consultation.
And yet, uncomfortably, there’s a tiny part of me that thinks Santa probably should at least attend safeguarding training and sign the social media policy like everyone else.
Magic is all very well. But even at the North Pole, someone ought to be doing the paperwork.
Dwight Warner is the quintessential oddball Brit, with a weirdly American-sounding name, who has a knack for turning the mundane into the extraordinary. Hailing originally from London, now living in the sleepy depths of Lincolnshire but claiming an allegiance to the absurd, Dwight has perfected the art of finding the surreal in real life. Whether it’s a spirited rant about the philosophical implications of queueing or a deep dive into why tea tastes better in a mug older than you, his blogs blur the line between the abstract and the everyday.
With an irreverent wit and a penchant for tangents that somehow come full circle, Dwight Warner doesn’t just write; he performs on the page. His humour is both sharp and delightfully nonsensical, like Monty Python met your nosiest neighbour and they decided to co-write a diary.
Known for being gregarious, Dwight is the life of any (real or metaphorical) party, whether he’s deconstructing the existential crisis of mismatched socks or sharing his inexplicable theories about why pigeons are secretly running the economy.
A larger-than-life personality with a laugh as loud as his opinions, Dwight Warner invites readers to step into a world where everything’s slightly askew—and that’s exactly how he likes it.
Discover more from untypicable
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.