Lord Stuart Rose, former CEO of Marks & Spencer and Asda, has recently reignited the debate on working from home, labelling it as “not proper work” and citing it as a key factor in declining productivity and wellbeing in the UK. Speaking to BBC Panorama and in subsequent comments, Rose argues that the shift to remote and hybrid working has set the UK back two decades in workplace efficiency and culture.
But is working from home truly the culprit behind national productivity woes? Or is this critique a reflection of outdated workplace norms struggling to adapt to a changing world? To examine these claims, we’ll unpack Lord Rose’s arguments, consider the broader sociological and economic context, and explore the perspectives of both proponents and critics of remote work.
The Argument Against Working from Home
Rose’s position is clear: working from home, while perhaps a necessity during the pandemic, is now seen by some traditionalists as a hindrance to productivity and collaboration. He highlights the following concerns:
- Productivity Decline: Rose claims that working practices have regressed, impacting the nation’s overall economic health.
- Loss of Workplace Culture: He suggests that face-to-face interaction fosters relationships and innovation, which are diminished in a remote or hybrid environment.
- Generational Impact: By implying that a “generation” isn’t doing proper work, he casts doubt on the long-term impact of remote working on career development and business success.
These concerns aren’t unique to Rose; they echo the sentiments of corporate leaders like those at Amazon and JP Morgan, who have called staff back to the office, arguing that in-person work is essential for collaboration and productivity.
The Case for Working from Home
While Rose’s critique has found support among traditionalists, it overlooks significant evidence favouring remote and hybrid working. Here are some key counterpoints:
1. Productivity Is Not a One-Size-Fits-All Metric
Studies, including those by Stanford University economist Professor Nicholas Bloom, show that hybrid working can be just as productive as full-time office work, particularly when employees work in the office for two to three days a week. Workers report fewer distractions, better work-life balance, and increased job satisfaction—all of which contribute to higher productivity in the long term.
Critics of Rose’s position would also argue that productivity isn’t just about hours logged in the office but about the quality and impact of the work produced. Remote work has allowed many employees to focus deeply without the constant interruptions of office life.
2. The Real Productivity Problem Is Bigger
The UK’s productivity issues predate the remote working era and are rooted in systemic economic challenges, including stagnant investment in technology and infrastructure. Blaming working from home for these problems feels like an oversimplification.
3. Flexibility Attracts and Retains Talent
Remote working options have become a key factor in employee retention. As highlighted by employees in these debates, the ability to work from home is valued as much as an 8% pay rise. Companies that embrace flexibility are likely to attract a broader, more diverse workforce, including parents, caregivers, and individuals with disabilities.
A Generational Divide?
Rose’s assertion that working from home has created a generation “not doing proper work” risks alienating younger workers, many of whom entered the workforce during the pandemic. These employees are navigating a world where flexibility is no longer a perk but an expectation.
However, his point about younger workers benefiting from in-person mentorship is worth considering. Early-career professionals may indeed miss out on opportunities for informal learning and networking when working remotely. The challenge lies in finding a balance that ensures access to mentorship without sacrificing flexibility.
Cultural Resistance: Nostalgia or Necessity?
Rose’s comments also highlight a broader cultural resistance to change. Many traditionalists view the office as a cornerstone of professional life, a place where relationships are built, and innovation flourishes. But does this romanticised view of the office hold up?
Research suggests that much of the perceived productivity in offices is performative—think long hours spent visibly working rather than efficiently producing results. Remote work strips away the façade, focusing on deliverables rather than appearances.
This shift has sparked a cultural clash, with traditionalists like Rose on one side and proponents of flexibility on the other. It’s worth asking whether the office-first mindset is driven by nostalgia rather than necessity.
The Sociological Perspective: Work-Life Balance Redefined
From a sociological standpoint, the rise of remote work represents a significant cultural shift. Émile Durkheim might have seen it as a reimagining of collective life, with the office no longer serving as the primary site of social integration. Meanwhile, Max Weber’s “iron cage” of bureaucracy feels increasingly relevant, as rigid office structures give way to more fluid ways of working.
Diane Reay’s work on inequality also offers insight into this debate. Flexible working has opened doors for many individuals who were previously excluded from traditional office life, such as caregivers and people with disabilities. However, the push to return to the office could reinforce existing inequalities, favouring those who can afford to commute and adapt to rigid schedules.
A Balanced Path Forward
While Rose’s concerns about collaboration and culture are valid, they don’t necessitate a wholesale rejection of remote work. Instead, businesses should adopt a nuanced approach that blends the benefits of in-person interaction with the flexibility of remote work.
Key steps could include:
- Structured Hybrid Models: Setting clear expectations for in-office and remote days to balance collaboration and productivity.
- Mentorship Opportunities: Creating intentional programs for remote mentorship to support early-career employees.
- Outcome-Focused Metrics: Evaluating performance based on results rather than physical presence.
Reassessing What “Proper Work” Means
Lord Rose’s comments reflect a broader unease with the rapid changes in workplace culture. But to dismiss remote work as “not proper work” is to overlook the substantial benefits it offers to both employees and employers.
The challenge lies in creating a system that balances the flexibility employees value with the collaboration businesses need. By embracing a hybrid approach and focusing on outcomes rather than tradition, we can move past the culture wars and towards a more inclusive, productive future.
So, is working from home the death of “proper work”? Not quite. It’s just a different way of working—one that reflects the complexities and opportunities of a modern, connected world.
AJ Wright is a quiet yet incisive voice navigating the surreal world of sociology, higher education, and modern life through the unique lens of a neurodivergent mind. A tech-savvy PhD student hailing from South Yorkshire but now stationed in the flatlands of Lincolnshire, AJ writes with an irreverence that strips back the layers of academia, social norms, and the absurdities of daily life to reveal the humour lurking beneath.
As an autistic thinker, AJ’s perspective offers readers a rare blend of precision, curiosity, and wit. From dissecting the unspoken rituals of academia—like the silent war over the office thermostat—to exploring the sociology of “neurotypical small talk” and the bizarre hierarchies of campus coffee queues, AJ turns the ordinary into something both profound and hilarious.
AJ’s unassuming nature belies the sharpness of their commentary, which dives deep into the intersections of neurodiversity, tech culture, and the often-overlooked quirks of human behaviour. Whether questioning why university bureaucracy feels designed by Kafka or crafting surreal parodies of academic peer reviews, AJ writes with a balance of quiet intensity and playful absurdity that keeps readers coming back for more.
For those seeking a blog that is equal parts insightful, irreverent, and refreshingly authentic, AJ Wright provides a unique perspective that celebrates neurodiversity while poking fun at the peculiarities of the world we live in.
Discover more from untypicable
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.